Tuesday 27 September 2011
Poor Pakistani and their Rich Rulers
Long ago I read that "law is made for the security of the wealth of rich", I always consider war is bad for humanity but poor pakistan who are already in state of war due to energy crises in Pakistan since almost four years, government failed to protect poor minister Mr Bhati but all others are in good security. Pakistanees are facing the exact condition of war without war, but rulers are in legacy and enjoying the peace but only before the thret of war by US officials, Poor believe that they will have to face no worry more than the current situation, I can read the situation like that Pakistani politicians want to earn by proving themselve helpless before USA, and they want to prove that they have obey USA otherwise USA can attack pakistan. Our bloody business mind politicians are planning to earn more by showing nation's anger to their ultimate boss and donor to beg more for their forgien bank accounts. At last I want to quote a truth that is very teaseing " if USA would get control of Pakistan than they will have unadjust "
Monday 26 September 2011
New tusel between USA and Pakistan
Here we are with Haqqani group which is bone of contension between two nations.
US forces's efforts are proved to be failed against this particular group, while no one from Pakistani officials can resist against US forces, why they are failed against Haqqani group, it is a quesion but they want to pressurize pak army to go fight against Haqqani group on pakistan's own cost. While we are thinking about "cost", it could be defined as:
1- Money:
US govt donated Pakistan many a dollars but for the different projects, fight against a well establish group is too much costly.
2- Human Resources:
Pak army will have to face a big human loss of army and civilian people.
3- Civilian Risk:
It is a big risj to start a war in civilian area while people will travel to pakistan's main cities and they could be dangerous (not all of them).
Solution of the matter: US forces shoule lead or do it alone in the war area only, or otherwise they will have to pay a big to pak government and empower pak army and encourage them to fight against that (non-terrorist) group (according to US govt).
Pakistan is being just pressurized to reduce the cost of this operation by Americans.
It could be worry for Pakistan's dollar eating government but niether for the Pakistan army nor for the common people.
Please feel free to comment.
US forces's efforts are proved to be failed against this particular group, while no one from Pakistani officials can resist against US forces, why they are failed against Haqqani group, it is a quesion but they want to pressurize pak army to go fight against Haqqani group on pakistan's own cost. While we are thinking about "cost", it could be defined as:
1- Money:
US govt donated Pakistan many a dollars but for the different projects, fight against a well establish group is too much costly.
2- Human Resources:
Pak army will have to face a big human loss of army and civilian people.
3- Civilian Risk:
It is a big risj to start a war in civilian area while people will travel to pakistan's main cities and they could be dangerous (not all of them).
Solution of the matter: US forces shoule lead or do it alone in the war area only, or otherwise they will have to pay a big to pak government and empower pak army and encourage them to fight against that (non-terrorist) group (according to US govt).
Pakistan is being just pressurized to reduce the cost of this operation by Americans.
It could be worry for Pakistan's dollar eating government but niether for the Pakistan army nor for the common people.
Please feel free to comment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)